PocketBase vs Appwrite
Ready-made self-hosted backends (BaaS), alternatives to Firebase. PocketBase is a single executable ideal for lean projects; Appwrite is more robust, with SDKs and team features.
| Tool | ★ GitHub | License | Platform |
|---|---|---|---|
| | 59,233 | MIT | Go, Docker |
| | 56,387 | BSD-3-Clause | Docker |
Popularity (★ on GitHub)
PocketBase is a complete backend in a single executable file: database, authentication, files and a realtime API. Self-hosted, it's the open source alternative to Firebase, ideal for apps and prototypes.
Appwrite is a backend-as-a-service (BaaS) platform with authentication, database, functions and storage, accessible via SDKs. Self-hosted, it's the open source alternative to Firebase for developers who want full control.
Frequently asked questions
Which is the best self-hosted alternative among PocketBase, Appwrite?
It depends on your case. PocketBase is the most popular (59,233 stars). Compare license, platform and features in the table above.
Are PocketBase, Appwrite free?
Yes, they're all open source and self-hosted — you run them on your own server with no monthly fee.